UN Wire’s headline today states that the European Commission
is discussing capping quotas on the production of food-based bio fuels because
current policies are resulting in the removal of crops from the global supply
chain, thus attributing to hunger problems. This successfully exhibits the
constant struggle of resource management, as Lianna’s essay focused on.
This proposal would limit biofuel usage to 5% until 2020
down from the current goal of 10% for transport energy from renewable
resources. While the current global economy is shifting towards renewable
resources, which I fully support in the long run, it presents definite problems
today. While we are using food-based bio fuel for transport costs, we have
overlooked its effect on the nutrition of the world’s people.
While all of our readings have emphasized the free-market
economy and expanding trade in at least some aspects, this requires more
transportation, whether that is of capital, goods, or people. In the
transportation sector, there has been an emphasis placed on renewable resources
to sustain our current levels of travel and trade and make it possible so that
these numbers can grow. Free trade has the potential to benefit all parties
involved and the application of renewable resources of energy fully supports
this claim. However, with this statement by the European Commission, we again
see the unfairness that developing countries are forced in to, regardless of
intentions. Renewable resources are not meant to cause harm, but they
undoubtedly have.
While the answer it not to simply revert back to
unsustainable practices, we must be even more cautious in the decisions we are
making in all aspects of globalization. I wouldn’t have thought that our
methods of transporting goods and services are directly impacting the lives of
many; this only goes to show the inherent unfairness present between developed
and developing countries that we must continue to be wary of.
No comments:
Post a Comment